 |
Active Resistance to
Metrication
Reply to: ‘Meadowbank’,
9 Station Cottages,
Brampton Road,
HUNTINGDON,
Cambridgeshire, PE29
3BW Tel: 01480 435837
Mr Tim Rawlinson
Tuesday 24 March 2004
Director-General,
Forestry Commission,
Silvan House
231Corstorphine Road
EDINBURGH
S C O T L A N D
EH12 7AT
Copied to:
Mr Mark Thorneycroft
Forestry Commission
340 Bristol Business
Park
Coldharbour Lane
BRISTOL
BS16 1EJ
Mr Bob Murray, Recreation Section
Burley Products
Lyndhurst Road
BURLEY, c/o
Forestry Commission
Queen’s House
LYNDHURST,
Hampshire
SO43 7NH
Dear Mr Rawlinson,
Re: Forestry
Commission’s Illegal
Metric Road Signs and
general policy of
obliterating the use
of British units of
measurement: New
Forest (Fritham),
Denbighshire (Moel
Famau) and
Bedfordshire (Shefford)
and elsewhere.
I refer to previous
correspondence on
this subject,
including the
enclosed letter dated
21 October 2002.
Your predecessor has
failed to take action
to prevent the
further erection of
illegal Forestry
Commission
green-and-white road
signs giving
distances to car
parks etc. in metres.
And you appear to
have done nothing
about existing
illegal signage. We
find it hard to
understand why the
Forestry Commission
goes on deliberately
breaking the law. We
were promised by your
predecessor that he
would take action and
he fully conceded in
writing to us and to
a Mr P Honey from
Staffordshire that
your metric distance
signs were illegal
and that he would
ensure that the
Forestry Commission
obeyed the law. The
fact that you have
failed to obey the
law and have
apparently failed to
inform your local
Forest managers about
the situation is now
wasting your money
i.e. public money.
Supporters of our
campaign have had to
deal three times with
an illegal set of
signs on the A 600
just north of
Shefford on the
Bedford Road. They
have erected plates
giving the correct
distance in miles and
yards, which of
course are the only
authorised units for
distance under the
Traffic Signs and
General Directions
2002. They have had
to do so again as the
plates were removed,
revealing the old,
illegal measurements
underneath.
At Fritham, on the
edge of the New
Forest, you have
failed for two years
to replace two
illegal signs.
Supporters of ours in
the area correctly
amended these signs
to read in yards and
miles a few weeks
ago. Amazingly, it
seems that local
staff ignored the law
and may be unaware of
the letters to you in
which we pointed out
the illegality of the
signs. They may not
be aware that your
predecessor, after
apparently taking
legal advice, readily
conceded that they
were illegal. Your
local officials have
wasted money by
re-erecting another
two brand new illegal
signs there in
metres! It is only a
matter of time before
those distances are
once again
obliterated by local
activists and covered
over by legal signs
in yards and miles.
We have previously
warned you that any
illegal metric signs
remaining on our
roads are at risk of
being amended without
warning by local
activists. We
respectfully re-issue
our warning in the
hope that you will
obey the law and
ensure that all
Forestry Commission
signs comply with the
law in future.
Finally, please note
that an independent
survey of over 1,000
people in 2002 showed
86% support for
keeping miles, yards,
feet and inches in
use on our roads,
with only 8% wanting
kilometres and
metres. The figures
were the same for
18-24-year-olds as
for older people. The
Commission’s
preference for
metric, if you don’t
mind me putting it
like this, goes right
against the grain.
Yours sincerely
Polly Peck (Miss),
Information Officer,
A.R.M.
Copied to: Minister
for Transport, for
the attention of Mr
Mike Talbot, Head of
the Traffic Signs
Policy Division,
Department for
Transport
|
 |